...Appeals has issued inconsistent decisions as to whether a scienter requirement exists in order to void a policy for a misrepresentation in the application. The North Carolina Court of Appeals...
...produce evidence within his reach renders it appropriate to presume that the evidence would have been detrimental to his case. See Randolph v. General Motors Corp., 93-1983 (La. App. 1st...
...harmless another party (the indemnitee) for acts or omissions relating to a construction project.[2] The general principles applicable to the construction and interpretation of contracts are equally applicable to contracts...
...text available at 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9182), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in a Maryland environmental liability case that insurers had not created a...
...we found that a few instances in which there is conflict between a state court approach and the approach employed by federal courts in that state. For example, in Colorado,...
...to apply the doctrine of strict liability to cases within the nexus of construction work.[20] Florida Florida applies § 520 of the Restatement (Second) Torts in order to determine if...
...as the main ingredient. However, it appears that the bars are “mostly made from pears and apples.”[62] Consumers may have been misled because they may specifically be wanting to get...
...tort concept that applies only to reckless or intentionally tortious conduct that causes physical harm to a person or property, it has no application to a non-tort claim such as...
...from appellee’s alleged spoliation of evidence. Gregg v. Walgreen Co., 2021 WL 1881158, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 11, 2021, no pet.). Appellant fell in appellee’s store, the...
...of appeals chose not to enforce the confidentiality covenant, holding that it was overly broad. The court of appeals focused on the covenant’s “all data and information relating to the...